Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TheBoy]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

[TheBoy]

If I was the Chancellor, I'd bring in a 50% income tax rate for those working from home

Bee in your bonnet you'd like to share, Sir Tig?

[Kevin Wood]

And the rules on pensions, capital gains tax, and just about everything else that they didnt specifically promise not to raise.
And even those will be fair game once they spin doctors come up with answers as to why they broke promises to the electorate.
Biggest problem is, the Tories are only slightly less worse.

Indeed. People who work hard and look after themselves are a problem for Labour. They'll have us all on benefits and beholden to them too once the gouging is complete.

[Kevin Wood]

If I was the Chancellor, I'd bring in a 50% income tax rate for those working from home

Bee in your bonnet you'd like to share, Sir Tig?

<Looks around> Hmm. guilty as charged.

I'm about to stop this and go the the pub. Would you be happier then, Tigger?

[Migv6 le Frog Fan]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

TB. You do realise that we now live in a Police state ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ2Pe1uslYE

[YZ250]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

TB. You do realise that we now live in a Police state ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ2Pe1uslYE

Seen that clip before and you notice how plod said 'I don't want to arrest anyone BEFORE making some enquiries'. What a dumb arse, or is that how it works now. You get arrested first and THEN they start investigating. You couldn't make it up could you. 

[Sir Tigger KC]

If I was the Chancellor, I'd bring in a 50% income tax rate for those working from home

Bee in your bonnet you'd like to share, Sir Tig?

Yep I'm thousands of pounds out of pocket thanks to oppsing useless work from home solicitors, who took eons to respond to emails (probably because they were too busy doing the allotment/walking the dog/down the pub) and if they did manage to answer the phone invariably claimed that they'd left the file in the  office and they weren't going in for a fortnight.

oppsing useless idiotting  Lady bitss the oppsing Lady bitsing lot of them!   

[Kevin Wood]

If I was the Chancellor, I'd bring in a 50% income tax rate for those working from home

Bee in your bonnet you'd like to share, Sir Tig?

Yep I'm thousands of pounds out of pocket thanks to oppsing useless work from home solicitors, who took eons to respond to emails (probably because they were too busy doing the allotment/walking the dog/down the pub) and if they did manage to answer the phone invariably claimed that they'd left the file in the  office and they weren't going in for a fortnight.

oppsing useless idiotting  Lady bitss the oppsing Lady bitsing lot of them!   

Solicitors are just the same when they're "working" in offices, in my experience.

[Doctor Gollum]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

TB. You do realise that we now live in a Police state ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ2Pe1uslYE

Seen that clip before and you notice how plod said 'I don't want to arrest anyone BEFORE making some enquiries'. What a dumb arse, or is that how it works now. You get arrested first and THEN they start investigating. You couldn't make it up could you. 

PACE certainly used to be detained to facilitate a prompt investigation into xyz...

Pretty certain than legislation hasn't changed unless TCV emergency powers are still active.

[YZ250]

According to the poll on here before the GE, three OOF members said they were going to vote Labour. I hope they are suitably remorseful.
………….

Well I can confirm 100% that one of them wasn’t me.    I’ve filled in every petition going to try to get rid of Starmer but I know it’s a fruitless exercise. 
I get angry just seeing his face, and I punch things when I get angry. I’ve got through 5 iPads and a laptop since he got voted in. 

[STEMO]

According to the poll on here before the GE, three OOF members said they were going to vote Labour. I hope they are suitably remorseful.
………….

Well I can confirm 100% that one of them wasn’t me.    I’ve filled in every petition going to try to get rid of Starmer but I know it’s a fruitless exercise. 
I get angry just seeing his face, and I punch things when I get angry. I’ve got through 5 iPads and a laptop since he got voted in. 

That's 5 iPads more than Mrs Opti 

[Raeturbo]

I’d like to put his face in front of your fist for you👍👍

[YZ250]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

TB. You do realise that we now live in a Police state ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ2Pe1uslYE

Seen that clip before and you notice how plod said 'I don't want to arrest anyone BEFORE making some enquiries'. What a dumb arse, or is that how it works now. You get arrested first and THEN they start investigating. You couldn't make it up could you. 

PACE certainly used to be detained to facilitate a prompt investigation into xyz...

Pretty certain than legislation hasn't changed unless TCV emergency powers are still active.

My point was that I believe that their code of practice states that to be arrested, they have to state why they’ve arrested you, and they clearly didn’t know what charge at that point. Detaining him whilst they investigated would have been fine (well not for him obviously  ). Detaining and arresting are two separate things, although they both take away your liberty. People who are arrested without being told a valid section can, and do, successfully sue the police for unlawful arrest. The ignorance of the police these days costs the tax payers a small fortune. Can you tell that they’re not on my favourites list. 

[Field Marshal Dr. Opti]

Can't wait for Rachel Reeves budget.   

She hasn't actually said much at all. All the stuff that's being put out by 'treasury officials' is probably to manage expectations.

If I was the Chancellor, I'd bring in a 50% income tax rate for those working from home and a 90% income tax rate for all diversity, equality and inclusion roles. 

100% would make it more inclusive.

[johnnydog]

Getting them into gainful employment would be better.

That ship has long sailed.

Only leaves stopping the benefits system - will never happen - or shoot 'em.

TB. You do realise that we now live in a Police state ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ2Pe1uslYE

Seen that clip before and you notice how plod said 'I don't want to arrest anyone BEFORE making some enquiries'. What a dumb arse, or is that how it works now. You get arrested first and THEN they start investigating. You couldn't make it up could you. 

PACE certainly used to be detained to facilitate a prompt investigation into xyz...

Pretty certain than legislation hasn't changed unless TCV emergency powers are still active.

My point was that I believe that their code of practice states that to be arrested, they have to state why they’ve arrested you, and they clearly didn’t know what charge at that point. Detaining him whilst they investigated would have been fine (well not for him obviously  ). Detaining and arresting are two separate things, although they both take away your liberty. People who are arrested without being told a valid section can, and do, successfully sue the police for unlawful arrest. The ignorance of the police these days costs the tax payers a small fortune. Can you tell that they’re not on my favourites list. 

A person who is arrested only needs to be told they are being arrested, the reasons for the arrest, but there is no requirement to inform them of the act and 'section'. If it is quoted, it isn't any detriment, but it not a requirement under PACE.
Just saying....