As far as Putin is concerned, a now proved lunatic
Have I missed something? Surely even the Ruskis would remove him from office if it was proven that he was a sandwich short? And the Chinese and Indian authorities wouldn't be so keen to back his regime either.
Now I'm not saying he has got all his dogs on one lead, or that its an allowable situation, but as we do not know what his plans are, I think we're still a way off calling it lunacy.
I wasn't around at the time, but was anyone calling Eisenhower a lunatic in the mid 50's, when the situation was reversed (in very simplistic terms)?
I actually said…………..” and an absolute lunatic, monster, and completely evil bastard!
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
”
I would also add of a paranoid character. Yes, he has a circle of like minded men who are dreaming of a neo-Soviet Union. But they are not close to him and he feels he cannot trust them, hence his meetings with them across a very long table, or by video feed. He no doubt is trying to protect himself from assassination like a bomb under the table!
He is following a pattern that dictators follow, like Hitler, of pushing his luck, gambling on weak opposition, and then acquiring land mass that he believes he has a right to, ignoring the risks to his own people and the extreme costs that could be the result, although always believing he will not lose.
Yes, judging him on what he has carried out so far in striving to reach his objectives in Ukraine, he IS a lunatic who is extremely dangerous.
As for Dwight D. Eisenhower, that President did not invade a democratic nation. He opposed the spread of Communism, and the power of the Soviet Union and China, with of course the action to keep South Korea democratic. He opposed the Soviet Union’s invasion of Hungary during their revolution to bring in democracy in 1956. He also supported the aims to keep South Vietnam a democratic State. But he did not support the “Imperial” type invasion of Britain, Israel and France in their attempt to control Egypt and it’s Suez Canal, also in 1956, by highly dubious means orchestrated by the mentally ill Anthony Eden.
So I cannot see how you can compare him and his actions, always favouring infant democracies, with Putin. The latter is a completely different kettle of fish, as Putin is opposed to democracy.
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)