There is no easy answer.

Welcome to OOF
|
31
on: Yesterday at 13:23:43
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by Migv6 le Frog Fan | ||
|
Problem is, that then means the U.S. will probably be run by Socialists.
There is no easy answer. ![]() |
||
|
32
on: Yesterday at 13:05:03
|
||
| Started by Varche - Last post by YZ250 | ||
This is an example of Tactical Rapid Access Reverse Flow, carried out on live lanes until a complete stoppage can be organised. Obviously precautions have to be taken to slow everyone else down to a safe level. ![]() |
||
|
33
on: Yesterday at 12:11:22
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by STEMO | ||
Size of population is irrelevant. Its the principle of self determination that matters.We can always hope the Donald loses his majority in both houses in the mid terms. |
||
|
34
on: Yesterday at 12:04:46
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by Migv6 le Frog Fan | ||
|
Size of population is irrelevant. Its the principle of self determination that matters.
It has been the bedrock of governance of the free world for a long time, and why the UK sent its forces to take back the Falklands, for example. If the U.S. throws that in the bin it becomes another rogue state like Russia, Iran, Libya etc. etc. |
||
|
35
on: Yesterday at 11:51:11
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by STEMO | ||
Greenland has a population of around 56,000, mostly Eskimo. There is no army.Bomb MacDonalds |
||
|
36
on: Yesterday at 11:41:09
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by Field Marshal Dr. Opti | ||
|
Greenland has a population of around 56,000, mostly Eskimo. There is no army.
Trump doesn't need to invade. I believe there is a small US military base there. He can simply walk in and have a nice cup of tea. The question is what would assorted European countries do if he did this? |
||
|
37
on: Yesterday at 11:21:39
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by Doctor Gollum | ||
Which new war exactly?he has thus far done EVERYTHING he said he would... |
||
|
38
on: Yesterday at 11:05:28
|
||
| Started by STEMO - Last post by Migalot | ||
he has thus far done EVERYTHING he said he would... Except, "no new wars"... ![]() |
||
|
39
on: Yesterday at 08:42:50
|
||
| Started by Varche - Last post by YZ250 | ||
Monday. Smart motorway. The M1 heading south. Serious accident 350 yards up from us.. Four lanes of stationary traffic.That's not exclusively a smart motorway problem, but no hard shoulder really doesn't help matters. Err, what you describe is exactly what happens around here, after certain safety measures have been taken obviously. Its called Tactical Rapid Access. Its a common sight on the M40/A40, as its by far the quickest way to reach the incident. Im not suggesting the decision is taken lightly with no prior thought. It obviously has to be a controlled set up for it to work. Police guidance : Tactical Rapid Access: Motorway/Bypass Blocked Traffic: A major accident completely stops traffic, making normal access impossible; driving the "wrong way" cuts down travel time significantly. Strategic Access: Control rooms direct vehicles to rendezvous points (like slip roads) where they can safely enter the carriageway and travel against traffic flow to the incident. Time is Critical: In emergencies, seconds matter, and this method allows for faster arrival to save lives or manage the scene. |
||
|
40
on: Yesterday at 07:28:40
|
||
| Started by Varche - Last post by Varche | ||
|
Lorries . One doing 50 mph and a whole string overtaking doing 56 but seems like 50.1111 mph.
With modern vehicles surely they can all safely cruise at the same speed? |
||