Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

616

General Car Chat / Re: Worst car...

« on: 25 February 2010, 17:59:58 »

worst cars 405Glx 0r the citroen possibly 19 both 1.9 td. Both as bad as each other :-/ :-/

617

General Car Chat / Re: What made you buy an Omega?

« on: 09 January 2010, 14:45:14 »

I was doing some work at a well known car dealers ,and I was  looking for a car with a towbar and big and powerful enough to pull about a ton.when they took one in part exchange and offered it to me cheap .That was seven years ago.Now im on to my second omega,I carnt think of what i would want to replace it with.Yeah the've got there problems,not the best on fuel,but until recently they have allways gettin me to where i want to go  8-)

618

General Car Chat / kent moore

« on: 10 November 2009, 20:31:36 »

would any body know of a web site with kent moore tools on and numbers,im tring to find out what a km-6362-1,km-6362-2 and last km-609-21 are used for.          cheers charlie

619

General Car Chat / Re: IM IN TROUBLE WITH THE MRS

« on: 18 October 2009, 20:16:26 »

i thought there was only 500 built of them cav calabres,cant see many been left on the road

620

General Car Chat / Re: Blind Button Part Number

« on: 18 October 2009, 20:49:39 »

9184770,theres a control unit aswell.

621

General Car Chat / Re: LPG v GPL

« on: 19 August 2009, 13:37:32 »

This is nothing to do with lpg,went to france, filled car up at sunderland,used 60l to get there, filled car up in france it took 90l to get home there was no difference in the weight nor driving cc all the way.  :- [smiley=undecided.gif] [smiley=undecided.gif]?

622

General Discussion Area / Re: Artificial petrol: 90p per gallon

« on: 30 January 2011, 20:53:09 »

so about 70p is pure tax??

the news would be interesting if someone drove a tank through the gates of downing street and into number 10 through the wall wouldnt it

who could afford to run a tank

623

General Discussion Area / Re: Sainsbury's - What are they On??

« on: 29 January 2011, 22:03:23 »

I know that knife crime is a very serious issue and I fully condone whatever measures are necessary to curb this type of crime BUT....My daughter has just moved in to a new flat. She went to her local Sainsbury's today with her boyfriend to buy some kitchen bits and pieces - first flat she needed everything - including a cheese knife.

At the checkout the girl asked my daughter for ID (for the knife) which she produced (she's 23). The checkout girl also then asked her boyfriend for ID (he's 25) but he didn't have any. They refused to sell the knife to my daughter because in their opinion she may have been buying it for her boyfriend - presumably to use maliciously - I would have thought the conveyor full of other kitchen utensils would have been a bit of a clue as to their real intentions. 

Now well up for an argument she protested to the manager to no avail and she left the shop empty handed and an hour of shopping time wasted. The managers parting comment was that if Sainburys sold her the knife and her boyfriend was under age she could sue them!!!!

I can't wait to waste a couple of hours tomorrow doing the biggest shop I can, loading up the converyor then walking away when my teenage son can't produce appropriate ID - which I demand they ask for - because I've put some lagers on the counter. I might even do it more than once just to really p*ss them off.

Check out girls are not the moral guardians of the general public......The lady in question simply has to satisfy herself that the person buying the knife is 18 years or over......It is not for them to make moral judgements.......

Exactly Opti!

It's common sense really Lizzie.......for example......a 50 year old man buys some alcohol with his 17 year old daughter present...........however....the girl on the till thinks the man may offer the girl a little tipple ...so refuses to serve the man.......NONE OF THEIR FU*KING BUSINESS......

Delightful way of putting it. Humm how about their job for starters?  Think thats their business? Yes it is. 

Nope wrong again......It is insulting to suggest to a customer......I will not serve you alcohol because you look like the type of person who MAY give it to your underage children.......If that's not a moral judgement then I don't know what is.....

The law states you can give under eighteens a drink(it actually from 5 years of age )so what the problem with selling to somebody who may or may not give some away.the laws the law personal judgement should not come into it

624

General Discussion Area / Re: Why Cant I Just Get A Break

« on: 20 December 2010, 22:57:24 »

CAnt help with the amount used,but if you have babies the gas/eletric company can not refuse you a non pay as you go metre(free of charge),Your childrens needs comes before there profits

625

General Discussion Area / Re: 9/11 Conspiracy?

« on: 12 September 2010, 18:24:12 »

http://wtcdemolition.com/ * please watch the video..

I watched bit of that and the "narrator" says "watch the ejections of material form the side of the tower keeping pace with the collapsing floors. Perhaps you can think of a natural cause, I can't".

My response to the narrator? That's because you're thick and/or suffering from cognitive dissonance.

Last night I watched an interview with a fire fighter who was trapped in the collapse. One of the most telling remarks he made was that the collapsing floors above caused hurricane like winds as the air was compressed and ejected outwards.

Like I said, natural causes.

Sorry it doesn't support the demolition theory.

 

I do demolition for a living,when I/we pull steel framed buildings down, the gust of wind is the most dangerous part because it picks up anything that been left  lying around and sends it flying like a rocket through the air

626

General Discussion Area / Re: 9/11 Conspiracy?

« on: 11 September 2010, 22:19:13 »

It's the American government that is questionable, not the people. Of course Bush had a hand in 9/11.

The main priorities for many CIA agents was to obtain footage from any cctv cameras that had an outside view along the last stretch flight path of the 'plane' that hit the Pentagon ?  They knew which 'plane' it was etc, so what use would this be ?

And as for the announcment that the passport of one of the terrorists had been found in the rubble. 

It took a while for me to pay any attention to these conspiracy theory nutters, but there are far too many theories that sound more probable than the ones the U.S governments official announcments would have us believe.   

 

That's the thing...its so unbelievable that an american government would do such a thing its a PERFECT cover.

They know the masses would never believe it....they don't...so they have gotten away with it,just like they knew they would.

Lets face it 60 years ago if someone said ££were gonna walk on the moon"" they would have been laughed at for being a complete idiot,never happen...impossible.

Only it has happened and it is possible...just like the impossible government cover up which is 911.

Depends who you talk to 

Mr and mrs spoon

627

General Discussion Area / Re: 9/11 Conspiracy?

« on: 11 September 2010, 19:28:51 »

May be someone,knew what was planned and took measures to bring the building down in a safe and controlled manner,     just in case,what was going to happen could not be stopped

628

General Discussion Area / Re: Maths puzzle

« on: 22 September 2010, 20:32:50 »

Wheres the bed again

629

General Discussion Area / Re: Maths puzzle

« on: 22 September 2010, 20:12:30 »

It could be upto 172

Have you changed that

Obviously.

THought soo

630

General Discussion Area / Re: Maths puzzle

« on: 22 September 2010, 20:07:59 »

It could be upto 14

Have you changed that