11716
Omega General Help / Re: Same part question ?
« on: 09 November 2016, 21:37:07 »
A bit late I know, but I think the part number for a new one is 9117095.

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section
He is President of the United States, not the free world.
And he's won it fair and square. Let him be judged on his Presidency, not his campaign
A Republican trifecta might not be best for the country as a whole, but it is what it is...
Two articles below give the viewpoint of why the authors think the judges got it wrong.
http://www.ukipdaily.com/article-50-case/
http://www.ukip.org/high_court_judgement_a_political_not_legal_decision
The easy response is "they would say that wouldn't they", but the first one in particular, puts forward a pretty strong case, in my opinion.
The problem for those that argue that the court has no jurisdiction until after Art50 is actually invoked and/or ECA72 is revoked (as your second link states) is that both parties agreed that the decision to invoke Art50 is a justiciable matter (which means both parties accept that the court does have jurisdiction). The relevant bits of the full judgment are Paras 4 and 5 where this is stated as common ground.
You can't win an argument on a point that you both agree on. The Govt could change tack and decide it does not think UK courts have jurisdiction, but that just makes them look like a bunch of shambolic part time amateurs, and I can't see the Supreme court overruling the High court on that point alone.